INTEGRATED ESG
REPORT 2020

Based on an annual review of the internal control and risk management systems, the PGNiG Group does not operate a comprehensive corporate risk management system. At the PGNiG level, risk management processes are formalised and defined for key business areas. Risks are identified, addressed and assessed in accordance with the methodologies and assessment scales adopted in respective business areas. Risk management processes in particular areas are based on internally developed risk models and records, and risk management processes are identified and submitted for assessment to representatives of individual organisational units (management staff).

However, the Company recognises the need to develop a comprehensive and integrated risk management system. At the strategic level, the Company is pursuing a process mapping project across the PGNiG Group. It is expected that the project will also cover the defining and structuring of a process integrating risk management at the PGNiG Group level.

Risk matrix

20-img-pgnig-en 20-img-pgnig-en

Operational risks

Risk materiality level:  low   ; medium ; high

Probability that the risk will materialise: low  ; medium ; high

Yoy change in the risk level:  increase ; decrease ;  no change

Changes in and impact of material operational risks on the PGNiG Group

Risk Desrcibtion
Resource discoveries and estimates

Poland:

Norway:

The main risk inherent in exploration activities is the risk of failure to discover hydrocarbons, i.e. exploration risk. This means that not all identified leads and prospects actually have deposits of hydrocarbons which can qualify as an accumulation. In addition, the actual quantity and quality of accumulated hydrocarbons may differ from estimates. If the results of successful exploration in the form of new reserves do not balance production from existing fields, the recoverable reserves in the PGNiG Group’s fields will gradually decrease as the production continues.

Reserves estimates and production projections may be erroneous due to imperfections inherent in the applied equipment and technology, which affect the quality of the acquired geological information. Irrespective of the methods applied, data on the volume and quality of commercial reserves of crude oil and natural gas is always an estimate. Actual production, income and expenses relating to a given deposit may significantly differ from estimates. The weight of this risk is further increased by the fact that in the full business cycle the period from start of exploration to the launch of production from a developed field takes six to eight years, while the production lasts from 10 to 40 years. Formation characteristics determined at the stage of preparing the relevant documentation are reviewed after production launch. Any downward adjustment of the reserves or production volumes may lead to lower revenue and adversely affect the PGNiG Group’s financial performance.

Competition

In the Exploration and Production segment:

Poland:

Norway:

In the Exploration and Production segment: Both in Poland and abroad there is a risk of competition from other companies seeking licences for exploration and appraisal of hydrocarbon deposits, although it should be noted that this risk has significantly diminished in the Polish market over the past year. Certain competitors of PGNiG, especially those active globally, enjoy strong market positions and have greater financial resources than those available to the Group. Thus, it is probable that such companies would submit their bids in tender procedures and be able to acquire promising licences, offering better terms than PGNiG could offer given its financial and human resources. This competitive advantage of oil majors is particularly important on the international market.

In the Trade and Storage segment: As in previous years, competitors seek to increase gas fuel sales by offering competitive prices of the fuel or dual fuel (gas and electricity) bundles. A noteworthy development is also the growing activity of large energy companies on the Polish natural gas market.

Given the prevailing trend in supplier switch numbers (according to URE data), the number of people switching energy supplier should increase in the coming years.

Delays

Poland:

Norway:

Under the applicable Polish laws and regulations, the process of obtaining a licence for exploration and appraisal of crude oil and natural gas reserves lasts from one to one and a half years. In foreign markets such procedures may even take up to two years from the time the winning bid is awarded until the actual contract is ratified. All these factors create the risk of delays in the start of exploration work. The formal and legal obstacles, beyond PGNiG’s control, include those related to:
  • local governments’ failure to approve local zoning plans or amendments to those already approved;
  • obstacles in having investment projects incorporated into the local zoning plans;
  • requirement to obtain and comply with administrative or other formal and legal decisions, including environmental decisions or building permits;
  • amendments to the current investment project;
  • difficulties in obtaining the landowners’ consent for access to the area.

These factors materially delay investment activities and entering the area to commence construction work. Further, PGNiG’s obligation to comply with the Public Procurement Law frequently protracts tender procedures. A protracting project exacerbates the risk related to estimation of capital expenditure.

Safety, environmental protection and health regulations

Poland:

Norway:

The need to ensure compliance with environmental laws in Poland and abroad may significantly increase the PGNiG Group’s operating expenses. Currently, the Group incurs significant capital expenditure and costs to ensure compliance of its operations with the ever more complex and stringent regulations concerning safety and health at work, as well as environmental protection. Offshore upstream operations carry a significant risk of environmental pollution resulting from oil spills. The risk is monitored on an ongoing basis, and field operators have implemented a number of barriers and technical solutions to mitigate the risk.
Cost of exploration

Poland:

Norway:

Capital intensity of an exploration project depends on prices of energy and materials. Cost of exploratory work is especially sensitive to steel prices, which are passed onto prices of casing pipes and production tubing used in drilling. An increase in prices of energy and materials translates into higher costs of exploratory work. Profitability of foreign exploration projects also depends to a significant extent on prices of oil derivative products and on exchange rates. In order to reduce drilling work costs, in 2011 PGNiG introduced a daily rate system for selecting and paying contractors for these works.
Unforeseen events and emergencies

Poland:

Norway:

Hydrocarbon deposits developed by the PGNiG Group are usually located at great depths, which involves extremely high pressures and, in many cases, the presence of hydrogen sulfide. Consequently, the risk of hydrocarbon blowout or leakage is very high, which in turn may pose a threat to people (employees and local population), the natural environment and production equipment.
Changes in legal regulation

Poland:

Norway:

In some countries, exploration and production activities may be hindered by frequent and unexpected changes in legislation, which may give rise to particularly serious risks in countries with authoritarian regimes.
Political and economic situation

GK PGNIG:

Some countries where the PGNiG Group is conducting exploration and production activities are threatened by conflicts and terrorist attacks, which may lead to limitation, suspension or even discontinuation of such activities.

The PGNiG Group’s operations are also exposed to the risk of social or political unrest in some regions. Changes of governments may result in withholding issuance of petroleum licences. Those countries are also at risk of internal conflicts and civil unrest due to poverty and demographic issues. If these risks materialise, the Company’s activities may be limited, suspended or discontinued.

In certain countries, operations of exploration companies may be hindered by the absence of adequate infrastructure, which may be an obstacle in transporting equipment, personnel and materials to the sites. Problems may also arise in providing supplies and ensuring appropriate health care. These risks may lead to limitation or suspension of the Company’s exploration activities.

Opposition from local communities

The protests of residents of areas where drilling operations were carried out focus, among other things, on noise emitted by the drilling equipment working around the clock, increased vehicle traffic and the destruction of roads, as well as concerns about environmental pollution (water, soil). Protests result in delays or suspension of drilling work, prolongation of administrative procedures and damage to the Company’s image. In order to minimise the risk, the locations of wells are reviewed in terms of potential conflicts and dedicated information campaigns are conducted. It is increasingly more common that local communities expect to receive direct benefits.
Administrative regulation of natural gas prices and deregulation of the Polish gas market

Gas trading on the exchange market has been excluded from the tariff regime. Prices of gas paid by end users have also been gradually liberalised as the process of deregulation advances. The first customer groups in respect of which the tariff requirement has been disapplied are wholesale and business customers. Currently, sales in Poland to the largest customers are done on market terms, either through POLPX or on the basis of market price indices. Due to the fact that the structure of sales is not perfectly matched by the structure of purchases (e.g. due to production of own source) and that prices in individual markets may vary, there is a risk of inaccurate estimation of income and expenses, which may adversely affect the financial results.

Dependence of PGNiG OD’s revenue on tariffs approved by the President of URE is the key factor affecting the company’s regulated business. Tariffs are crucial to the company’s ability to generate revenue that would cover its reasonable costs and deliver a return on the capital employed. Currently, a significant portion of that revenue depends on the selling prices of gas fuel and is regulated. Inaccurate estimates of demand for gas (affecting the accuracy of projected purchase volumes) and changes in prices of gas purchased on the Polish Power Exchange, which cannot be accurately projected, may have an adverse effect on the financial performance of PGNiG OD.

Disruptions in gas supplies from countries east of Poland

There were no significant disruptions to natural gas supplies from the east in 2020. PGNiG was prepared to cope with reductions or interruption of natural gas supplies from Ukraine from January 1st 2020 due to the transit agreement between PAO Gazprom and NAK Naftogaz of Ukraine expiring at the end of 2019. Eventually the transit agreement between Russia and Ukraine was signed and the continuity of gas supplies was maintained.
Take-or-pay gas supply contracts

PGNiG is a party to long-term take-or-pay contracts for gas supply to Poland, and committed to duly discharging its obligations under those contracts. Assuming that PGNiG’s customer portfolio remains unchanged, the volume of gas imports specified in the take-or-pay contracts will allow the Company to optimise its gas purchases under long-term and spot contracts, including for LNG. If PGNiG loses its market share, there is a risk that the Company would be forced to look for new ways to utilise the surplus volumes of gas in its portfolio.
Limited market development in terms of supplying the distribution network

Limitations at the entry points to the distribution system result from the limitations of the supply network and the insufficient capacity of gas stations. Consequently, the possibility of connecting new customers and gas network roll-out may be limited. In addition, end users may switch to direct or substitute competitors.
Lack of long-term regulatory policy

The risk is related to the absence of long-term rules for determining the level of prices and charges in the distribution tariff. If the risk materialises, tariffs may be set at levels that do not secure the expected return on capital invested in the distribution of gas fuels and it may be difficult to obtain approval for each subsequent tariff. A measure to prevent the risk from materialising is to seek implementation of legal changes obliging the President of URE to establish a multi-year tariff regulation model, development of a regulatory-econometric model and a relevant agreement with the URE.
Claims raised by property owners

The risk arises from failure to secure a permanent legal title to property at the stage of project execution and property owners’ higher awareness of the related legal aspects. The consequences of materialisation of the risk include excessive (above market prices) claims made by property owners, increase in litigation, litigation costs, claims for removal or alteration of infrastructure, as well as provisions and claims related to extra-contractual use of property.
Substitution

The substitution risk is associated with a potential lower cost of using alternative fuels and with unavailability or insufficient capacity of the gas network. The risk may arise from the inability to use a wide range of marketing tools due to the nature of the business (separation of distribution and sales operations), from the direction of changes in the national energy policy, and from fuel prices on commodity exchanges. Materialisation of the substitution risk may result in constraints for the roll-out of the programme to connect new areas to the gas network or may affect revenue and volume growth. It may also impair the efficiency of the networks built
Lower amount of EU funds allocated for financing gas distribution projects

This risk may result from fund allocation priorities set by the institutions responsible for distribution of EU funding. Unfavourable fund allocation may result in unavailability of financing for submitted projects or in low efficiency of such projects.
Limitations on the contractors market

This risk may result from an insufficient number of qualified contractors, deteriorated competitiveness in the contractors market, and increase in the cost of labour, materials and services. Should this risk materialise, implementation of planned investment processes may be slower than expected.
Electricity prices
Zmienność ceny energii elektrycznej jest jednym z podstawowych czynników ryzyka oddziałujących na wynik finansowy segmentu Wytwarzanie. Sprzedaż energii elektrycznej podlega zasadom ograniczającym ekspozycję na jej zmienność. Negatywny wpływ niższych cen na wyniki ogranicza sprzedaż w powiązaniu z zakupem uprawnień do emisji CO2.
Prices of CO2 emission allowances

The Group purchases CO2 emission allowances in quantities representing the difference between actual emissions and the emissions covered by free allowances it receives. Purchases of CO2 emission allowances are made subject to specific rules, in particular with respect to the time horizon of the purchase transactions and focus on performance.
Fuel prices

In the Generation segment, coal and biomass are used mainly for heat and electricity production. Matching the timing of sales of electricity and certificates of origin with the timing of fuel purchases makes it possible to partly to mitigate the adverse impact of rising fuel prices on the Company’s results.
Coal procurement and supply

Coal is purchased by the Company mostly under contracts executed in advance to ensure that strategic coal stocks are maintained above the level required by the Regulation of the Minister of Economy. Coal transport services are purchased in accordance with the Public Procurement Law.
Adapting to BAT requirements

With installations adapted to meet the requirements expressly stated in the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), the next step will be to ensure compliance with emission limits imposed under the decision establishing the BAT Conclusions for large combustion plants. The deadline for compliance is August 17th 2021 or, where an IED derogation applies to an installation, the end date of the relevant derogation period. An investment plan has been developed for the PGNiG TERMIKA to ensure that the emission and technology requirements defined in the BAT Conclusions are duly met. The process of obtaining amendments to integrated permits in connection with the adaptation to the BAT requirements is in the final stage. Also, the implementation of the BAT Conclusions is monitored on an ongoing basis and any doubts as to their interpretation are clarified.
Volume risk

The volume of sales of cogenerated heat and electricity depends on weather conditions in the heating period. Above-average air temperatures result in lower sales and consequently lead to lower financial results of the Generation segment. Due to the volume risk, production plans are adjusted to climate trends.

Regulatory risks

Changes in and impact of material regulatory risks on the PGNiG Group

Risk Description
Obligation to diversify gas imports

The Council of Ministers’ Regulation of April 24th 2017 on the minimum level of diversification of foreign sources of gas supplies prescribes the maximum share of gas imported from a single country in total gas imports in a given year. In 2017–2022, the share may not exceed 70%. In view of the solutions adopted in the Regulation, the regulatory risk of its breach is low, as is the probability of its materialisation.
European Green Deal

At the time of the issue of the Communication on the European Green Deal (EGD), a very ambitious climate agenda of the new European Commission (EC) was presented. In 2020, work continued at the EC on specific draft legislation implementing the EGD. The Communication explicitly states that the EC will seek to phase out financing of fossil fuel infrastructure and to reduce the use of fossil fuels in the long term, in line with the climate neutrality objective.
New EU legislative package for the natural gas market

The EC is currently carrying out analyses to identify regulatory gaps for the natural gas sector. The potential new gas package is to consist of regulations on the operation of the natural gas market in the European Union, and rules designed to accelerate the decarbonisation of the EU’s natural gas sector. In this respect, a proposal of regulations is expected which will probably provide for preferential treatment of decarbonised/renewable gases

Non-compliance risk

Changes in and impact of non-compliance risk on the PGNiG Group

Risk Description
Non-compliance risk

PGNiG has an organisationally and functionally separated Compliance unit. In line with the compliance risk management model, each area at risk of non-compliance was assigned a dedicated compliance risk area manager (leader), who is in charge of ensuring that compliance standards are met. In 2020, the PGNiG Compliance Risk Management Procedure (the Compliance Programme) was adopted, which formalises the Company’s compliance management model.

Compliance risks (risks of breaching compliance standards) may arise in various areas and may materialise:

  • Immediately as fines, damages, compensation or other liabilities the Company may be required to pay,
  • as damage to the Company’s image, which could also have its financial implications;
  • in the Company’s operations
  • and as a factor affecting the value for stakeholders, including shareholders.

As part of anti-corruption measures, the Company put in place the Anti-Corruption and Gift Policy of the PGNiG Group. In addition, the Ethics and Compliance Management System of the PGNiG Group was adopted, as a result of which the ethics and compliance areas were integrated in the Compliance Department. The Transparency Policy for Managers was introduced, with the principal objective of eliminating the risk of conflicts of interest and lack of transparency in decision-making processes within the Group. The Group also follows the PGNiG Group Code of Ethics, which is based on four values: quality, reliability, responsibility and partnership. The Procedure for Reporting Cases of Misconduct and Handling the Reports at PGNiG was also adopted, setting out the rules for reporting violations of laws, procedures and ethical standards by employees, as well as the procedure for handling such reports.

Financial risks

PGNiG and the PGNiG Group are exposed to financial risks, including in particular:

Non-financial risks

Risks related to environmental aspects

Environmental aspects
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Risk of environmental accident at CNG stations due to leaks of substances/oils from tanks and containers, machinery and equipment located at CNG stations, or non-compliance with environmental regulations, machinery and equipment failures, human errors. Implement environmental protection measures in accordance with current external and internal regulations, including but not limited to:
  • Waste handling manual,
  • Process manual for bunkering,
  • Fire safety instructions for CNG stations,
  • Explosion Protection Documents for all CNG stations
high
2 Risk of contamination or environmental damage occurring prior to decommissioning process and not identified before its commencement or in the course of ongoing decommissioning operations on a field, e.g. well decommissioning and site restoration.
  • Identify pre-existing pollution and its locations,
  • Plan decommissioning along with full restoration only where pre-existing pollution has been identified earlier in the process,
  • Ensure that environmental damage sites are restored by PGNiG Group companies
medium
3 Risk of planning investment projects in areas with localities of protected species of plants, animals or fungi and protected habitats both within and outside Natura 2000 sites. Perform a wildlife survey before the start of the facility design process, use appropriate technologies (e.g. controlled drilling), adapt the construction and erection schedule to eliminate any interference with breeding periods, as a last resort – re-route  medium
4 Risk of industrial accident (fire, explosion) and/or structural collapse.
  • Meet the obligations of upper tier establishment operators by developing and applying SEVESO documents,
  • Carry out periodic inspections and audits of buildings, equipment and systems according to manufacturers’ recommendations and regulatory requirements,
  • Perform periodic operation and effectiveness checks of security and alarm systems,
  • Control access to site, train visitors,
  • Providing periodic training on relevant procedures to employees,
  • Supervise the selection of work contractors,
  • Comply with OHS and fire safety regulations and cooperate with competent authorities (State Fire Service, Provincial Inspectorate for Environmental Protection).
medium
5 Risk of pipeline/system leaks resulting in process failures, which may pose a risk to the continuity of plant operation, pose a health hazard or cause potential losses to customers.
  • Construction of pipeline according to Office of Technical Inspection and District Mining Office requirements,
  • Ensure proper selection of materials,
  • Carry out pressure testing and scan all welds before placement in service,
  • Ensure continuous process control,
  • Use a range of protective systems (grounding, gas detection, light and sound signalling, leak detection),
  • Carry out regular inspection and maintenance of security and alarm systems,
  • Select and provide training to operation staff,
  • Accident handling manuals.
medium
 6 Risk of contamination of green areas and transport routes. Designate appropriate transport routes and supervise transport service providers and vehicles used; supervise the transport of hazardous materials. medium
 7 Risk of incorrect waste sorting Supervise waste sorting practices, permits held by collectors and operations of waste collection companies; keep day-to-day records; provide and designate waste storage locations; ensure marking of containers. medium
 8 Risk of negative environmental impacts, especially in terms of noise emissions into the environment during drilling operations. Locate drilling sites at least 250 metres away from any buildings, provide noise protection screens, reduce noise emitted by drilling rig equipment, measure noise emissions; prepare noise emission distribution models at an earlier stage, consult local communities and authorities.  medium
 9 Risk of exceeding emission limits set for fuel combustion pollutants Flue gas emissions from the emitters are continuously measured. The executive order concerning monitoring of systems for continuous measurement of particulate and gaseous emissions in accordance with environmental protection regulations regarding responsibility for supervising, inspecting and ensuring reliability of systems for continuous measurement of particulate and gaseous emissions was implemented medium

 

Climate change risks

Climate change risks
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Risk of climate change impacts due to greenhouse gas releases from electricity generation.
  • Monitor electricity consumption, upgrade or replace captive heat sources.
  • Energy efficiency improvement – PPEE
medium
2 Risk of air pollution caused by emissions of greenhouse gases or other substances from transport and combustion processes in heat sources.
  • Prepare annual reports for environmental use locations to be submitted to the national database on emissions of greenhouse gases and other substances (KOBIZE) by technology: plants, sources, emitters. Regular KOBIZE reporting makes it possible to compare and verify emission volumes of greenhouse gases and other substances into the air.
  • Implement appropriate procedures, such as the ECO DRIVING procedure for business car users at PGNiG OD
medium
3 Risk of increased CO2 emissions related to expansion of the PGNiG Group. Use low-carbon technologies, implement R&D&I projects focused on energy self-sufficiency of hotels and manufacturing complexes based on cogeneration and renewable technologies low
4 Risk of a natural disaster, including escalation of extreme climatic events such as earthquakes, floods, landslides etc
  • Choose locations outside of seismic hazard zones and floodplains,
  • Fabricate infrastructure according to Office of Technical Inspection and District Mining Office requirements, using appropriate technology and materials, and ensure proper infrastructure monitoring – periodic inspections of all technical systems.
low
5 Risk of lack of legal regulations for low-carbon fuels causing uncertainty in investment process. Take active part in legislative consultations. medium
 6 Risk of failing to achieve environmental targets under planned investment projects where actual benefits from a project do not generate the expected value, understood as meeting the emission standards required by law. Hold regular management meetings within the BAT/MCP Team, periodically review the scopes, budgets and schedules of environmental projects, periodically evaluate the programme of plant adjustment to environmental requirements by environmental protection units with the involvement of investment project units, analyse an environmental project immediately before handover for execution, provide for warranty and indemnity clauses in contracts and agreements. medium

 

Social risks

Social aspects
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Image risk – negative reception of PGNiG’s and the entire Group’s business, communication or marketing activities by stakeholders, including local communities – bad publicity in traditional and social media.
  • Internal rules governing contacts with the media and use of social media by employees,
  • Building lasting media relations,
  • Ongoing monitoring and contact with key journalists,
  • Quick analysis and response to negative publicity,
  • Ongoing social media monitoring,
  • Internal regulations on crisis communication,
  • Good practices with respect to field business operations, including dialogue with stakeholders concerning new projects.
medium
2 Risk of exploration work causing inconvenience to local communities
  • Use of new technology solutions. Development projects,
  • Fair analysis of the location of planned work, cooperation between organisational units responsible for the design of exploration work (land surveyors, geologists, drillers) and identification of its environmental impact (environmental protection units), cooperation with local authorities,
  • Education and information initiatives intended to provide project updates.
medium
3 Risk of conflicts with local communities causing obstacles to upstream activities.
  • Fostering cooperation through sponsorship, image-building and CSR projects and events,
  • Cooperation with local authorities,
  • Education and information initiatives intended to provide project updates,
  • Interviews with local communities, open/one-on-one meetings, negotiations and mediation.
 medium
4 Risk of misunderstanding the nature of upstream activities and their environmental impact.
  • Inviting visitors or allowing tours around gas extraction facilities, gas storage facilities, etc.
  • Information meetings with local authorities and local communities.
 medium
5 Negative reception of the Company’s CSR activities by the social environment – negative assessment of PGNiG’s actions (expectations not met satisfactorily, needs not responded to). This hampers field operations and brings up the costs of communication with local communities and stakeholders.
  • Operations of the Sponsorship Committee,
  • Activities coordinated with the Foundation.
  • Channels in social media allowing quick and interesting communication.
 medium
 6 Interruption of continuous comprehensive customer service during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Appointment of the COVID-19 Prevention and Response Team; one of the Team’s objectives was to maintain business continuity of the Company and the Group in the context of ensuring Poland’s energy security and supporting efficient communication, employee safety and customer service during the pandemic,
  • Development of remote comprehensive customer service – at times, contact only via the telephone and Internet,
  • Ongoing monitoring of the epidemiological situation.
high

 

Employee risks

Employee aspects
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Societal concerns generated by COVID-19 and risk of losing business continuity.

The halted economic growth, increased unemployment, as well as high COVID-19 incidence and morbidity rates during the pandemic period are generating substantial concerns not only about jobs, but also about personal safety

  • Appointment of the COVID-19 Prevention and Response Team; one of the Team’s objectives is to maintain business continuity of the Company and the Group in the context of ensuring Poland’s energy security and supporting efficient communication and employee safety during the pandemic.
  • Employees worked in split teams. Where presence on site was not absolutely necessary for the sake of business continuity, employees were requested to work remotely. Employees who had to work from the office were provided with the safest possible working environment, social distancing measures were applied between employees, personal protective equipment was available everywhere on site, and air purifiers were used.
  • Online communication was enhanced and face-to-face training was replaced with online courses. The internal communication system was improved.
high
2 Risk of competency gaps within key areas.

Due to the specific nature of the PGNiG Group, a wide range of competencies are unique to its industry. These competencies are hard to find, so if employees leave or their competencies are not improved, they will be difficult to restore or acquire from the market.

 

  • Continuous improvement of competencies through various forms of training (mainly online training in 2020),
  • Implementation of a leadership and management training programme,
  • A key roles identification system was implemented and key competencies were described at PGNiG with a view to identifying them and providing informed development opportunities.
medium
3 Loss of key employees. Due to the specific nature of the Group, loss of key employees entails a risk of difficulties in recruiting new staff from the market.
  • Implementation and operation of incentive and loyalty schemes, pay and fringe benefits,
  • List of key roles, a competency model prepared to track and develop universal, management and technical competencies,
  • Provision of replacements for key roles.
medium
4 Absence of candidates who would have specific competencies and would be ready to take up a job, especially highly specialised personnel.
  • Identification of challenges, referral programme.
  • This risk is mitigated through:
    • the Company’s recognition on the local market
    • a broad range of non-pay (fringe) benefits
    • the Company’s participation in job fairs,
    • recruiting candidates using alternative channels, including: Career Office, OLX website, pracuj.pl
    • the internally implemented employee recruitment procedure defining the rules and stages of recruitment process.
  • Monitoring pay rates offered on the market.
  • Offering staff incentives, also to improve their skills, and guidance developed on employee upskilling.
  • Policy on updating job descriptions and job evaluation.
 medium
5 Risk of conflicts with trade unions.
  • Regular meetings with social partners. (In 2020, more meetings were held online due to the pandemic).
  • Providing periodic information on the condition and plans of a given company,
  • Preparation of reliable documents, submitted for approval to trade unions, which enables efficient content review.
high
 6 Risk of a generation gap emerging. Limited transfer of knowledge and competencies due to retirements.
  • Planning employee recruitment, using incentives to encourage employees to announce planned retirement in advance. Programmes supporting effective talent pipeline development, such as:
    • Hooked on Science (technicians),
    • Termika for Power Engineers (engineers),
    • Mentoring Academy – an innovative development programme for employees of the Production Branches and the Odolanów Branch of PGNiG.
  • Provisions of Collective Bargaining Agreements governing the retirement programme, knowledge-sharing incentives etc.
medium
7 Risk of different interpretations of labour, tax and social security regulations (e.g. court rulings, audit follow-up decisions, recommendations, opinions/interpretations).
  • Requesting competent authorities and institutions to issue opinions and interpretations,
  • Internal legal opinion obtained from the legal and compliance units,
  • Following uniform rules of conduct across the organisation and communicating them during training sessions for employees and managers, to trade unions, at periodic meetings, and making appropriate changes in internal regulations.
medium
8 Sick leave, quarantine, isolation resulting in work disruption / lack of quick replacement options.
  • Appointment of the COVID-19 Prevention and Response Team; one of the Team’s objectives is to maintain business continuity of the Company and the Group in the context of ensuring Poland’s energy security,
  • Observing sanitary rules at work and maintaining safe working conditions,
  • Implementing more remote work options.
high

 

OHS aspects risks

OHS aspects
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Occupational risks for jobs determined on the basis of hazards identified for each job.
  • The Occupational Risk Assessment Team periodically reviews occupational risks using the Risk Score method (a quantitative approach),
  • The Hazard Identification and Occupational Risk Assessment Procedure, with the Risk Score Occupational Risk Assessment Manual and the Occupational Risk Scorecard Review and Archiving Manual as its integral part,
  • Executive order appointing the Occupational Risk Assessment Team
medium
2 Accidents at work or occupational diseases caused by poor work organisation, non-compliance with procedures or use of inadequate protection measures. Risk of temporary production stoppage due to a severe or fatal accident.
  • Implementation of the IMS and HSE system, including an observation and incentive programme for employees,
  • Regular OHS training,
  • Identification of near misses,
  • Ongoing supervision during the performance of high-risk work,
  • Choice of adequate safeguards against hazards,
  • Taking active and proactive measures to improve working conditions.
low
3 Inadequate working conditions – OHS rules are not provided at the workplace, which increases the risk of accidents at work, constituting violation by the employer of employee rights.
  • Regular OHS training for employees
  • Implementing and updating procedures and regulations to ensure that adequate working conditions are maintained – implementing the QHSE system,
  • Internal audits (including cross-audits), inspections and checks,
  • Ongoing supervision during the performance of high-risk work,
  • Identification of near misses,
  • Awareness-building through training, campaigns, drills, HSE meetings,
  • Dialogue with employees,
  • Investing in human resources and equipment,
  • Continuous improvement of the Integrated Management System,
  • Developing OHS staff competencies – training courses, industry meetings, also at the PGNiG Group,
  • Activity of the OHS Committee,
  • Up-to-date inspections and oversights.
low
4 Acts of employees and subcontractors resulting in violations of OHS laws. Reviewing and consulting contracts with subcontractors in terms of security certificates and safety clauses. low
5 Employees unable to respond to emergencies.
  • Developing an OHS hazard reporting system including allocation of responsibilities and supervision of the hazard identification process in occupational risk assessment,
  • Fire alarm drills,
  • Additional rescue training for staff.
low

 

Ryzyka dotyczące aspektów etycznych

Ethics aspects
No. Identified non-financial risk Method to prevent risk materialisation Materiality
1 Risk of corruption and bribery
  • Compliance with the principles set out in the PGNiG Group Anti-Corruption and Gift Policy, the PGNiG Group Code of Ethics, the PGNiG Group Ethics and Compliance Management System and the Transparency Policy for Managers. In particular, these documents support and regulate the management of the above risks.
  • Information and education activities addressed to employees to improve their understanding of pertinent regulations and values and to raise their awareness of potential consequences of violations, including ethics and anti-corruption training.
medium
2 Loss of the Company’s reputation and image as a reliable and trustworthy organisation may have far-reaching negative legal consequences.
  • Legal regulations adopted by the Group, i.e. the PGNiG Group Anti-Corruption and Gift Policy, the PGNiG Group Code of Ethics, the PGNiG Group Ethics and Compliance Management System.
  • Making employees aware of the applicable regulations, availability of documents, obligation to know the regulations in place and staff training.
high
3 Risk of a corrupt employee using the Company’s assets to the Company’s detriment, including the following violations:
  • fraud (misrepresentation concerning the provision of a service),
  • theft of property,
  • obtaining and unlawful use of any information constituting trade secrets, commercially sensitive information, personal data or classified information,
  • tampering with reported data in order to avoid disciplinary measures or to obtain a bonus,
  • conflict of interest,
  • bid rigging,
  • cybercrime,
  • disclosure of contact details of prospective PGNiG Group customers,
  • misappropriation of the PGNiG Group’s assets.
  • Compliance with the provisions of:
    • Code of Ethics,
    • Rules of personal data protection,
    • Rules of preventing fraud and anti-corruption guidance,
    • Compliance Programme,
    • Instruction on the protection of trade secrets,
    • Instruction on contract awards and expenditures,
    • Investment project execution procedure,
    • Rules for calculation of contractual penalties,
    • Contract and agreement templates.
  • eB2B procurement platform,
  • Institutional control,
  • Functional control.
high
4 Offering or accepting a gift without reporting it in the register of benefits. Increasing employee awareness by communicating the applicable anti-corruption provisions of the PGNiG Group Anti-Corruption and Gift Policy. One way to prevent potential violations is to regularly remind the employees by email about the requirement to comply with anti-corruption provisions. Employees are obliged to:
  • report any gifts accepted or offered,
  • report any instances of corruption identified,
  • submit declarations on the absence of any instances of corruption
low
5 Poor employee awareness (regardless of position) of the need to monitor and report any instances of corruption (including suspected corruption).
  • Preparation of newsletters to support internal communication,
  • Provision of training to improve awareness and knowledge,
  • Appropriate internal regulation.
high
6 Data leak or loss.
  • Emergency Procedure,
  • Trade Secret Procedure.
high
7 Risk of labour rights violations. Any act or behaviour related to or directed against an employee, such as unequal treatment, discrimination, workplace harassment etc.
  • Compliance with the provisions of the Code of Ethics on the prevention of workplace harassment, which apply to all employees and define preventive measures and rules of handling harassment reports.
  • In addition, all newly hired employees must read and sign the Notice on legal provisions governing equal treatment in the workplace (Article 941 of the Labour Code) and familiarise themselves with the company’s Work Rules.
  • Training and education in this area, especially for managers.
medium

Search results